Posts tagged ‘banks’

Domestic cash-strapped companies may soon find it easier to access credit, as banks and financial institutions (FIs) are planning to slash interest rates further in the next 2-3 months, if there is no significant improvement in the economic scenario.

Several banks and FIs such as the State Bank of India (SBI), Punjab National Bank (PNB), Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) and Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) Housing Finance have recently reduced interest rates on home loans and auto loans as special offers for the upcoming festive season. Industry experts believe that the lowering of interest rates could boost demand in the real estate and automobile sectors in the coming days. Continue reading ‘Banks, FIs May Cut Interest Rates Further’ »

Credit Union is very similar to banks, but credit unions have some unique characteristics that make the institution different. Is a credit union better than a bank? A credit union is an institution owned by the “members” or customers. Contrast this with banks where the customers are just customers. Banks answer to profitability – usually shareholders own a bank and expect financial performance from bank management. Credit unions are nonprofit organizations that strive for service over profitability. While it is true that credit unions are nonprofits, however they are not charities. Credit unions must make sound financial decisions. If all the customers own the credit union, then who has time to run the place? Credit unions actually have the same type of personnels as banks. Upper management consists of a board of directors who make decisions on credit union operations. This board is composed of elected volunteers. They don’t do it for pay – rather, they are credit union members who want a say in how the place is run. In its simplest form, a credit union gets money from its customers and loans that money out to other customers.

Credit unions will typically offer the same products and services as larger banks. However, some credit unions will choose not to offer every product and service out there. The reason is that these credit unions do not do the same amount of volume that larger banks do. Banks can afford to have “loss-leaders” or products that get customers in the door. Credit unions will more likely only offer the products and services that a large portion of the membership is likely to use. Credit union deposits are insured very much like your bank deposits. The organization that insures the two types of institutions is different. However, the quality of insurance is the same in my mind – backed by the full faith and credit of the US government.

Continue reading ‘Is Credit Union a Good Alternative to The Banks’ »

Are you worried about money, paycheck has not yet come? Don,t worry payday loans can help you to find the solution of like this. Payday loans are very short term loan. You can’t think of about long term use of those loans. One can use these loans in any purposes. Under any emergency circumstances, you can take these loans. You can use your loan amount in any purposes. You can pay the electricity bills, child’s school fees or what ever you want.

Instant payday loans are always been an attractive loan options among the UK people. There are lenders who are providing instant payday loans. You can also take these loans to keep continue with all the amenities of your’s life. You need not to extend your hand before your relatives or friends in emergency. As UK people are very dependent on debt, most of the people bears two three loans. So under such a situation banks are trying to exploit the potential of this group. In UK these loans are very popular because it doesn’t consider bad credit as a disqualification. Though the indebted people but have regular income can easily avail these loans. These loans are last resort of the loan for some people.

Continue reading ‘Instant Payday Loans – Find a Loan In A No Time’ »

The great thing about debt settlement companies is that the really good debt settlement companies will give you straight answers. For example, banks are currently in a “survival mode” that could last for years. Thing is, banks will never actually admit to this for various reasons. Banks may still be a safe place to stash your cash, but after years of lending money out to people who are in a financial bind, the entire banking industry is paying a steep price. So, banks, lenders and other financial institutions are changing the fine print in certain agreements, covering their losses, charging you more and so forth. Quality debt settlement companies around the nation are informing their clients that their debt and debt problems are due in part to the inner workings of troubled banks.

Customer service is getting worse (it wasn’t that great to begin with) and banks are cutting jobs so that less people are trying to do more work. That means if you’re trying to settle a debt and get rid of your debt problems, you need more time to handle the situation than you probably have available. This is why a quality debt settlement company can help you with your debt problems by dealing with your lenders for you. You may not have to time to negotiate, haggle and make offers back and forth, but quality debt companies can, and will.

Continue reading ‘How Debt Settlement Can Help Against Banks’ »

This article is a follow-up to my recent piece on “America’s Financial Oligarchy” which was a synopsis of Simon Johnson’s “The Quiet Coup” on how the financial industry has effectively captured our government. It is an edit and review of a lengthy 231-page report prepared in March 2009 by the Consumer Education Foundation (see wallstreetwatch.org/reports/sold_out.pdf) on how, over the years, the ‘Money Industry’ as they refer to the financial oligarchy, sold out America to gain such control. Like Simon’s article the Consumer Education report deserves much more exposure than it will receive in its original format and hence my effort to distill it into a 3-page summary, with my comments where warranted, for your quick review.

The ‘Money Industry’ Bought Control of America for $5.2 Billion

Harvey Rosenfield, President of the Consumer Education Foundation, contends that “Over the last decade, Wall Street (i.e. the entire financial sector consisting of commercial banks, accounting firms, insurance companies, securities firms including hedge funds and private equity firms) showered Washington with over $1.738 billion in supposed ‘campaign contributions’ and another $3.441 billion on 2,996 officially registered lobbyists (more than five for each Member of Congress) whose job it was to press for deregulation. In return for the investment of this $5.179 billion, the Money Industry was able to get rid of many of the reforms enacted after the Great Depression and to operate, for most of the last ten years, without any effective rules or restraints whatsoever.”

The Transfer of Power Took 25 Years

• Beginning in 1983 with the Reagan Administration, the U.S. government acquiesced to accounting rules adopted by the financial industry that allowed banks and other corporations to take money-losing assets off their balance sheets in order to hide them from investors and the public.

Between 1998 and 2000, Congress and the Clinton Administration repeatedly blocked efforts to regulate “financial derivatives” — including the mortgage-related credit default swaps that became the basis of trillions of dollars in speculation.

• In 1999, Congress repealed the Depression-era law that barred banks from offering investment and insurance services, and vice versa, enabling these firms to engage in speculation by investing money from checking and savings accounts into financial “derivatives” and other schemes understood by only a handful of individuals.

• Taking advantage of historically low interest rates in the first few years of this decade, mortgage brokers and bankers began offering mortgages on egregious terms to purchasers who were not qualified. When these predatory lending practices were brought to the attention of federal agencies, they refused to take serious action. Worse, when states stepped into the vacuum by passing laws requiring protections against dirty loans, the Bush Administration went to court to invalidate those reforms, on the ground that the inaction of federal agencies superseded state laws.

• The financial industry’s friends in Congress made sure that those who speculate in mortgages would not be legally liable for fraud or other illegalities that occurred when the mortgage was made.

• Egged on by Wall Street, two government-sponsored corporations, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, started buying large numbers of subprime loans from private banks as well as packages of mortgages known as “mortgage-backed securities.” (See my article entitled “Our Worst Nightmare: The Puncture of the U.S. Housing Bubble” which outlined their house of cards approach.)

In 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission, now operating under the radical deregulatory ideology of the Bush Administration, authorized investment banks to decide for themselves how much money they were required to set aside as rainy day reserves. Some firms then entered into $40 worth of speculative trading for every $1 they held.

• With the compensation of CEOs increasingly tied to the value of the firm’s total assets, a tidal wave of mergers and acquisitions in the financial world — 11,500 between 1980 and 2005 — led to the predominance of just a relative handful of banks in the U.S. financial system. Successive administrations failed to enforce antitrust laws to block these mergers. The result: less competition, higher fees and charges for consumers, and a financial system vulnerable to collapse if any single one of the banks ran into trouble.

• Investors and even government authorities relied on private “credit rating” firms to review corporate balance sheets and proposed investments and report to potential investors about their quality and safety. But the credit rating companies had a grave conflict of interest: they are paid by the financial firms to issue the ratings. Not surprisingly, they gave the highest ratings to the investments issued by the firms that paid them, even as it became clear that the ratings were inflated and the companies were in precarious condition. The financial lobby made sure that regulation of the credit ratings firms would not solve these problems.

None of these milestones on the road to economic ruin were kept secret, says Rosenfield. The dangers posed by unregulated, greed-driven financial speculation were readily apparent to any astute observer of the financial system but few of those entrusted with the responsibility to police the marketplace were willing to do so and those officials in government who dared to propose stronger protections for investors and consumers consistently met with hostility and defeat. The power of the Money Industry overcame all opposition, on a bipartisan basis.

Continue reading ‘America: ‘Sold Out’ for $5.2 Billion!’ »

1. Free stuff from Banks

Banks have been in trouble over recent months, so now they are all wanting to attract savers, and they are offering great incentives to do so; for example, at the moment, the Alliance and Leicester are offer a £100 cash back offer. Credit card companies are also offering some great deals right now, and switching bank of credit card is really easy. For more information on where the best bank and credit card bonuses are, visit: http://bankbonuses.weebly.com

2. Make FREE phone calls online
Use Skype to make FREE calls to your friends and family anywhere in the world online. If they are not also Skype users then you can call their landlines for ridiculously low costs. They have some fantastic international rates too.

Continue reading ‘Beat the Credit Crunch now! The easy way’ »

Gone are the days when banks – and bank accounts – generally extended the same set of features. Instead, any given bank today usually offers a wide range of bank accounts for customers to choose from, with selections varying significantly from one bank to the next. Thus, consumers are able to select a bank account that caters to all their financial needs.

However, the sheer number of banks and types of bank accounts out there can also make the process of choosing an account seem overwhelming. So it’s best to break the process down into easier steps. To begin, you’ll need to choose a bank. Many people have either done business with banks before or currently have some type of account open with a local bank. If you already know which bank you want to open your account with, a large part of the work is already done. However, if you need to choose a bank, it’s best to do a bit of research first.

Start off by choosing a handful of banks in your area that you might want to bank with – then proceed to researching each of them further. You’ll initially want to consider aspects like locality and the number of branches in your area, extent of banking services, and customer service ratings – information that can all be gathered via online research or word-of-mouth. If you ultimately find you’re interested in multiple banks after your initial research, you can then start looking into each bank’s services and account types in more detail to choose the bank that’s right for you.

Continue reading ‘Finding a Bank Account that Caters to your Financial Needs’ »

Every time they think they’re out, Washington pulls them back in.

Like so many other major financial players, Bank of America (BAC:NYSE) has an office in Washington D.C. I don’t mean a branch office, but rather a shop full of sharp guys and gals dedicated to assuaging various regulating agencies and occasionally promoting the bank’s agenda to the White House and on Capitol Hill.

We are told that this was a sleepy little outfit a few years back – mostly just accountants and out-of-favor MBA types sentenced to a relative hinterland. The real action, the place to be for any up-and-comer looking to cut a swath back then, would have been the main headquarters in Charlotte or on Wall Street.

Back then, the Washington office would receive maybe two calls a day from legislators or their staff interested in the fine details of finance.

That Was Then…

But that was before the great crash of 2007/2008, wherein our banks discovered that their vaults were full of the same crap they had been peddling to the masses… and the great coup attempt that followed it, wherein a triumvirate of those same Wall Street bankers tried to take over the country.

Now that Washington owns a big chunk of some 600 American banks, the phones at Bank of America’s Washington office – and most every other major finance outfit to boot – are ringing off the hook with calls from pushy little Pooh-Bahs, apparatchiks with axes to grind, and ward heelers looking to score debating points in the next election.

From our friends at Bloomberg, we hear that Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) personally called to excoriate Citigroup for withdrawing credit from a New York mall developer. Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) called to object to American International Group (AIG:NYSE)’s contractually obligatory bonuses.

Continue reading ‘How They Roll in Washington, Part Deux’ »

I was reviewing our logs and noticed that someone had come to Jumbo CDs, looking for the answer to, “What is the difference between FDIC and NCUA Insured?”

Boy, did I feel silly because I didn’t actually have the answer on our site. After all, it is an important question for people investing their money into banks and credit union CDs.

And the answer is, there is really no difference as far as federal protection. Both cover your bank accounts (CDs, Savings, Checking, Money-Market) up to $250,000 through 12/31/13. If the Gov’t doesn’t extend that it will revert back to $100,000. Both cover your IRA accounts assuming they are in a bank account and not a securities account up to $250,000. That was a permanent change made in 2004. IRAs are insured separately then your regular bank accounts.

Both are federally guaranteed. The FDIC oversees and insures banks and the NCUA oversees and insures credit unions. However, the NCUA is currently in far healthier shape. Not that I believe the FDIC won’t be able to meet its obligations, you just don’t here about the NCUA having to bail out too many credit unions.

The biggest difference is credit unions overall, are in better shape then banks. We have dealt with countless bank closures the last two years. There has only been a handful of credit union closures. And the reason is the foundational difference between a credit union and a bank. At a credit union, everyone is a member and has one vote, no matter how big their deposits are. The credit union exists to extend the lowest loan rates and highest savings rates it can to its members. Credit Unions are non-profit organizations. Because of their non-profit status, they are limited in what they can invest in. Most of their investments are in boring things like CDs ( :O) ), Gov’t bonds, and treasuries. They are limited in who and what they can lend to. Both of these drastically lower the risk of having problems.

Continue reading ‘Are There Differences between the NCUA and FDIC?’ »

Over the last few years Indian Banking, in its attempt to integrate itself with the global banking has been facing lots of hurdles in its way due to its inherent weaknesses, despite its high sounding claims and lofty achievements. In a developing country like ours, banking is seen as an important instrument of development, while with the strenuous NPAs, banks have become helpless burden on the economy. Looking to the changing scenario at the world level, the problem becomes more ironical because Indian banking, cannot afford to remain unresponsive to the global requirements. The banks are, however, aware of the grim situation and are trying their level best to reduce the NPAs ever since the regulatory authorities i.e., Reserve Bank of India and the Government of India are seriously chasing up the issue. Banks are exposed to credit risk, liquidity risk, interest risk, market risk, operational risk and management/ownership risk. It is the credit risk which stands out as the most dreaded one. Though often associated with lending, credit risk arises whenever a party enters into an obligation to make payment or deliver value to the bank. The nature and extent of credit risk, therefore, depend on the quality of loan assets and soundness of investments. Based on the income, expenditure, net interest income, NPAs and capital adequacy one can comment on the profitability and the long run sustenance of the bank. Further, a comparative study on the performance of various banks can be done using a ratio analysis of these parameters. There are a number of ratios that can be used to comment on the different aspects :

The essential ratios that can be used for assessing the banks’ profitability and sustenance are

Profitability

Intermediation Costs/Total Assets

Assets

Net Interest Income/Total Assets

Other Income/Total Assets

Asset Quality

NPAs/Total Assets

NPAs/Advances

Staff Productivity

Net Profit/ Total Number of Employee

Sustenance

Capital/RWAs

For commenting on the Bank’s performance, a comparison to the total assets of the bank will give a true picture.

Controlled Expenses

The intermediation costs of a bank refer to the operating cost of the bank and include all the administration and operational costs incurred while offering its services. The ratio of the intermediation costs of the bank to the total assets should be kept low to ensure greater profitability. As mentioned earlier, a technology savvy bank will always be in a better position to reduce its operating costs. Consider the operating expenses of the various banking sectors and the industry average for the year 1999-2000. The costs for the entire SCBs rose by 9.1 percent. The maximum rise of 25.1 percent has been witnessed in the new private sector banks while the foreign banks experienced a decline in the operating costs by 3.3 percent. The ratio of the intermediation costs to the total assets indicates a decline. The maximum decline was in the case of new private sector banks and the foreign banks.

Margins – Lowered by Subdued Interest Rates

The ratio of the net interest income (Spread) to the total assets gives the net interest margin of the bank. This ratio is the actual measure of the bank’s performance as an intermediary, as it examines the bank’s ability in mobilizing lower cost funds and investing them at a reasonably higher interest. By borrowing short and lending long, banks can earn higher spreads nevertheless by doing so they will be exposed to greater risks. Hence banks need to be cautious and should not accept risks beyond their ability to control/manage them. Product innovation using the right technology is one approach, which can be followed by the banks to mobilize cheaper funds.

Continue reading ‘Performance measurement of Banks -NPA analysis & credentials of Parameters’ »