For many people, the job titles of accountant and bookkeeper are interchangeable. After all, doesn’t a bookkeeper maintain the accounts of a business by tracking accounts receivable, accounts payable, rent expense, payroll, etc.? The answer is yes, a bookkeeper does perform all of these accounting functions. So why does an accountant get paid so much more than a bookkeeper? Aren’t they one in the same?
To answer this question, we can first think back to geometry. To say that a bookkeeper is equivalent to an accountant is like saying a square is equivalent to a quadrilateral. Both are shapes with four sides. But a square is a specific type of quadrilateral with all four sides equal in length and four right angles. A quadrilateral, on the other hand, is more encompassing. A rectangle, a square and a trapezoid all are quadrilaterals. All have four sides, but it is the length of those sides and the angles between them that differentiate these shapes. The same holds true for accounting. Bookkeeping is a very specific part of accounting which looks at the tracking of money being spent and earned. We all do bookkeeping by (hopefully) balancing our checkbooks. But accounting, like a quadrilateral, is much more encompassing. Accountants use a technique called matching, which goes way beyond standard bookkeeping. Beyond basic bookkeeping, accountants must make decisions regarding the “how, when and why” of documenting a businesses finances. Matching is a principle used to allocate debits and credits to certain accounting periods and reconcile across types of financial statements. Although there are strict laws governing accounting, there is a certain amount of flexibility that allows accountants to have some control over the outcomes of their financial statements.
As a more specific example, let’s compare straight-line and double-declining balance depreciation. To oversimplify, in straight-line depreciation the cost of the equipment is divided by the number of years of its “useful life” (less the salvage cost, or final “worth,” of the equipment once it has reached the end of its useful life). This gives a depreciation amount that is the same year one as it is year ten. It is a very neat and reliable method to use, as there is no variation in the fixed amount.
Continue reading ‘Accountants: More Than Just Bookkeepers’ »